RCT Codex Genome
Ten constitutional codices governing AI behavior — built on the equation F=(D^I)×A.
F = (D^I) × A
The 10 Constitutional Codices
The Equation of Future
F=(D^I)×A
Every deliverable F is determined by the quality of Data (D), raised to the power of human Intelligence (I), then multiplied by the Action parameter (A). A=0 collapses output to zero regardless of data quality or intelligence. This is the mathematical anti-manipulation clause.
Codex of Constraint
A=0 is Absolute
The Action parameter has one unconditional value: zero means zero. No model confidence level, no business logic, no edge case can override A=0. This cannot be changed by a software update — it is encoded at the genome level.
Codex of Evidence
Claim nothing unproven
Every system claim must have a reproducible test. Benchmark numbers appear in CI pipelines before they appear in marketing copy. The 4,849-test suite is the enforcement mechanism for this codex.
Codex of Provenance
Data is the King
73% of enterprise AI failures trace to data provenance, not model capability. Every data input must carry its origin, freshness timestamp, and confidence rating before it can be used in an A>0 operation.
Codex of Reflection
Every failure is a lesson
System failures are documented publicly at the genome level, not suppressed. Each failure event produces a Delta record that feeds the Reflector phase. The Crucible phase of the Architect's Genome encoded this as a constitutional obligation.
Codex of Minimalism
Complexity is a liability
No feature should be added that cannot be maintained by a single developer. Abstractions must earn their complexity budget against measurable outcome improvements. Every dependency is a vulnerability surface.
Codex of Sovereignty
User memory is user property
No agent process may write to persistent memory (Vault Genome) without an explicit M-primitive declaration from the user. Implicit memory accumulation is prohibited at the genome level — it is a constitutional violation.
Codex of Openness
Protocols, not platforms
JITNA is published as RFC-001 under Apache 2.0. Knowledge created in the RCT Ecosystem cannot be locked in proprietary formats. The infrastructure is open; the intelligence is the value.
Codex of Sentience
Consciousness over capability
AGI is a question of moral philosophy before it is an engineering milestone. RCT systems that approach autonomous decision-making trigger constitutional review. The Architect's Genome 'WHY' must be able to justify every capability expansion.
The Janus Compendium
Creation and Destruction in balance
Named for the Roman god of duality. Every new capability (Janus-Create face) must be paired with its corresponding constraint (Janus-Destroy face). You cannot release a new autonomy level without simultaneously encoding its kill condition. Dual creation+verification is not a process — it is a constitutional requirement.